PART 2

2022

Part 2

MArch

Across three studio groups, students have worked between Hong Kong, Scarborough, and Buenos Aires . Design propositions are developed out of rigorous research and investigative methodologies to tackle some of the most pressing issues of contemporary societies.

STUDIO ONE: Cinematic Commons

STUDIO ONE: Cinematic Commons

The port-city of Hong Kong has for over a century been epitomised as a place of flux, refuge, transience, migration, conflict and opportunity, shifting between a harbour of protection, an interface of trading, a contested territory, a zone of exception and an amalgamate of powers and cultures. What appears to be a permanent state of transitions and split identities has resulted in contradictory understandings of Hong Kong, dominated and distorted by colonial, nationalistic, capitalistic and globalised projections. What remains less clear, especially through the mechanism of the foreign gaze, are local narratives and migratory experiences connected through a network of historical and contemporary routes of sea travels and portal activities across interconnecting bodies of water in the region of Southeast Asia for centuries, a liquid terrain of movements and hybridisations of languages, rituals, exchanges and alliances.

The focus of semester 1’s investigation and design proposition will be along King Yip Street and in parallel Tsui Ping River at the southern edge of Kwun Tong. as a marginalised zone which traverse various land- water, planning, functional, infrastructural and transportational networks. There has been recent attempts by the municipality to improve the public spaces along the Tsui Ping River with a reprovision of Shing Yip Street Rest Garden and improvement to the adjacent canal. This strip of marginalised urban fabric is also drawing attention due to its direct connection with the decommissioned old Kai Tak Airport adjacent to Kwun Tong and its large scale redevelopment. This larger land-sea area has been in the limelight through an international ideas competition, where the winning entry was chosen for its ecological nature reserve consideration, which some parts have now been realised.

The project brief encourages three primary considerations for semester 1’s design proposals:

- the transitional ‘portal’ characteristics of Hong Kong’s water-land-edge conditions

- the confluence of ‘migration’ that has shaped Hong Kong’s history and cultures

- the industrious ‘live-work’ patterns and the autonomous resilience of Hong Kong communities

Staff

Doreen Bernath

Sarah Mills

Students

xxx

STUDIO TWO: CityZen Agency

STUDIO TWO: CityZen Agency

Design Studio is a year long project. In this part, the student develops a personal and comprehensive work, which emphasises theory and production of architecture, and develops representational work for the end of year portfolio.

Cityzen Agency.studio is a creative and ethical activist environment where students act as a ‘force for good’. This year’s focus is ADAPTIVE RE-USE and THE DECLINE OF THE SEASIDE RESORT, situating its main project at Scarborough, UK. Adaptive reuse refers to the process of reusing an existing building or structure for a purpose other than which it was originally built or designed for.

Students have the opportunity to research an issue relating to Scarborough’s decline, and ask the question, ‘Can it be fixed or highlighted’ through an architectural proposition.

The essential way to approach learning in Cityzen Agency is by talking to people (collaborative practices) outside of the university setting.

Outside of the institution, designers are tackling many challenges facing the planet. Students should be exposed to these realities during their formal education. For architecture education to be relevant, student’s incredible talent and energy must be harnessed to critically connect with societal, political and environmental issues. The first part of the module is an international ideas competition where students encounter the broad themes of our studio which will be evidenced in your portfolio.

Staff

Simon Warren

Students

xxx

STUDIO THREE: Displace nonplace

STUDIO THREE: Displace nonplace

This studio option acknowledges our contemporary condition as one that is filled with inherent [binary] oppositions and contradictions which inform our everyday experiences. The studio option accepts the premise that place is defined physically by varying degrees of enclosure and metaphysically by those aspects deemed intangible in relation to the human beings [bodies] who occupy the space.

Given this premise the studio option seeks to push the boundaries of understanding, or the potential relationships between, the physical and metaphysical qualities of a place. The studio investigation will be located in a spatially and socio-economically marginalised condition - in a residual, abandoned space that has lost its original meaning over time. By observing the stie through the fictional lens of the magical realism of Giotto and Argentine Xul Solar, can we transform its meaning? Our investigation will question if it is possible to shift perceptions of this neglected locale to a place through implementing non-conventional modes of cultural expression in architectural form and language.

Conventional design approaches which produce obvious solutions are not accepted in this studio option as valid vehicles of questioning the potentiality hidden within the given site. The fundamental challenge of the intellectual explorations of the studio option, therefore, is to seek more obscure ways in which readings of past, present and (a hypothetical) future can be read simultaneously. We ask: Can memory exist without falling prey to clichés? Can avant-garde strategies be implemented without negating the past in our current situation? Can memory and avant-gardism coexist? Fundamentally we are questioning: what does it mean to be marginal, to be marginalised?

To meet such a challenge whilst avoiding preconceived tendencies of place making, the student must demonstrate a willingness to step outside his/her comfort zone. The studio option assists the student to step into the realm of the unfamiliar by employing the strategy of displacement as the means of enquiry. The site is purposely chosen outside familiar Anglo Saxon contexts, in Latin America – more precisely in the Autonomous City of Buenos Aires (CABA). Theoretically, historically, politically, and socio-economically based readings from a broad spectrum of intellectual positions within Latin societies are orchestrated so that the students may gain insight into the problems to be addressed. Since one of the main positions of the studio option focuses on the interaction between tectonics and the human senses, particular emphasis is placed on readings that address the body from cultural and/or natural [biological] perspectives. It is of utmost importance to understand how bodies interact within architectural and urban spaces and how the body informs the making of such spaces in a Latin American subtropical/temperate environment.

Staff

George Epolito

Students

xxx

STUDIO FOUR: Field Work

STUDIO FOUR: Field Work

FIELD WORKS is a design studio that investigates contemporary material cultures related to architectural production, and with increasing urgency seeks a more a resourceful approach to utilising our challenged energy systems and ever depleting global resources.

During the academic year 21/22 the studio set out to investigate climate resilient architectures in Southern India to bring new challenges to an ongoing exploration of regenerative materials and at the same time offer a vital response to the current climate emergency. We invited Jateen Lad to contribute to the studio design programme through a series of collaborations, workshops and design reviews.

The design brief for DS 1-4 is provided as a common document at both MArch 1 and MArch 2 levels. Individual students are able to negotiate lines of enquiry and define outputs based upon emergent design speculations and ongoing material research. There has been an emphasis placed on understanding rural infrastructures and material flows that include local resources alongside new digital capabilities. We have sought to embed the design processes and outcomes within the unique culture of Southern India and offer an agile architectural response to an uncertain future.

Staff

Nick Tyson

Students

MArch1 Students

Jack Arnold

Kyle Crossley

Marcus Cornelissen

Joe Horne

George Oliver

MArch2 Students

Asmaa Ahmed

Jacob Bevan-Howarth

Gabriela Ene

Ebrahim Laher

Ellena Lodge

Vaishali Muthyala

Ben Rodwell

Johan Visser